Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?
Date: 2020-09-17 03:06:03
Message-ID: 20200917030603.GB2873@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 06:03:02PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Rebased. Fixed bogus tests and strange tentative API change of
> SSLServer.pm. Corrected a (maybe) spelling mistake. I'm going to
> register this to the coming CF.

Stephen, are you planning to look at that? I know that you are not
registered as a reviewer, but you mentioned upthread that you may be
able to look at it.

The changes in libpq's backend/frontend are rather simple, but the
docs and the changes in the TAP tests require a careful lookup.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-09-17 03:25:02 Re: Redundant tuple copy in tqueueReceiveSlot()
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-17 02:58:26 Re: tab completion of IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA