Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?
Date: 2020-08-31 09:03:02
Message-ID: 20200831.180302.1762036380359974457.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Tue, 18 Aug 2020 16:43:47 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> Thank you very much. I'll do that after some polishing.
>
> A near-by discussion about OpenSSL3.0 conflicts with this but it's
> easy to follow.

Rebased. Fixed bogus tests and strange tentative API change of
SSLServer.pm. Corrected a (maybe) spelling mistake. I'm going to
register this to the coming CF.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Allow-directory-name-for-GUC-ssl_crl_file-and-connec.patch text/x-patch 68.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Georgios 2020-08-31 09:04:10 Re: [PATCH] - Provide robust alternatives for replace_string
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-08-31 08:56:58 Re: "cert" + clientcert=verify-ca in pg_hba.conf?