Re: replication wordsmithing / clarifications

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: replication wordsmithing / clarifications
Date: 2020-09-14 08:09:54
Message-ID: 20200914080954.GF2183@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 11:52:11AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> In particular, why is the primary a "server" and the replica a "node"? That
> caught my eye for inconsistency -- but changing node to cluster will be
> equally inconsistent, just in a different way. Why not just call them both
> servers?

Makes sense.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-14 08:11:01 Re: replication wordsmithing / clarifications
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-14 07:56:21 Re: Fix the example in the document of file-fdw