| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, ah(at)cybertec(dot)at, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: shared-memory based stats collector |
| Date: | 2020-09-09 14:41:20 |
| Message-ID: | 20200909144119.GR29590@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings,
* Kyotaro Horiguchi (horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > Shouldn't this:
> >
> > a) be back-patched, as the other change was
> > b) also include a change to have the stats collector (which I realize is
> > removed later on in this patch set, but we're talking about fixing
> > existing things..) for the same reason, and because there isn't much
> > point in trying to write out the stats after we get a SIGQUIT, since
> > we're just going to blow them away again since we're going to go
> > through crash recovery..?
> >
> > Might be good to have a separate thread to address these changes.
>
> +1
Just FYI, Tom's started a thread which includes this over here-
https://postgr.es/m/1850884.1599601164@sss.pgh.pa.us
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-09-09 14:46:28 | Re: SIGQUIT handling, redux |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2020-09-09 14:39:00 | Re: SIGQUIT handling, redux |