Re: Online checksums verification in the backend

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Online checksums verification in the backend
Date: 2020-09-09 13:41:30
Message-ID: 20200909134130.GA29325@nol
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:25:29AM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> I'll do some becnhmarking and see if I can get some figures, but it'll probably
> take some time. In the meantime I'm attaching v11 of the patch that should
> address all other comments.

I just realized that I forgot to update one of the Makefile when moving the TAP
test folder. v12 attached should fix that.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v12-0001-Add-a-pg_check_relation-function.patch text/plain 44.1 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2020-09-09 13:56:42 Re: Inconsistency in determining the timestamp of the db statfile.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-09-09 13:38:31 Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch