| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData() |
| Date: | 2020-09-08 19:19:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20200908191901.5extdjy6wdf2qrrq@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2020-06-07 11:24:50 +0300, Michail Nikolaev wrote:
> Hello, hackers.
> Andres, nice work!
>
> Sorry for the off-top.
>
> Some of my work [1] related to the support of index hint bits on
> standby is highly interfering with this patch.
> Is it safe to consider it committed and start rebasing on top of the patches?
Sorry, I missed this email. Since they're now committed, yes, it is safe
;)
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-09-08 19:24:54 | Re: More aggressive vacuuming of temporary tables |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2020-09-08 19:18:23 | Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput? |