Re: clarify "rewritten" in pg_checksums docs

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: clarify "rewritten" in pg_checksums docs
Date: 2020-09-07 06:00:20
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 05:26:16PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Using rewritten still sounds more adapted to me, as we still write the
> thing with chunks of size BLCKSZ. No objections with the addition of
> "in-place" for that sentence. Any extra opinions?

Seeing no objections, I have applied the original patch of this thread
down to 12.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-09-07 06:24:23 Re: Resetting spilled txn statistics in pg_stat_replication
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-09-07 06:00:08 Re: SQL-standard function body