Re: [PATCH] audo-detect and use -moutline-atomics compilation flag for aarch64

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Zidenberg, Tsahi" <tsahee(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audo-detect and use -moutline-atomics compilation flag for aarch64
Date: 2020-09-07 03:10:37
Message-ID: 20200907031037.GJ2455@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 09:00:02PM +0000, Zidenberg, Tsahi wrote:
> These results show only about 6% performance increase in simple-update, and very close
> performance in other results, most of which could be attributed to benchmark result jitter.
> These results from "well behaved" benchmarks do not show the full importance of using
> outline-atomics. I have observed in some experiments with other values and larger systems
> a crush of performance including read-only tests, which was caused by continuously failing to
> commit strx instructions. In such cases, outline-atomics improved performance by more
> than 2x factor. These cases are not always easy to replicate.

Interesting stuff. ARM-related otimizations is not something you see
a lot around here. Please note that your latest patch fails to apply,
could you provide a rebase? I am marking the patch as waiting on
author for the time being.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2020-09-07 03:14:21 Re: Spurious "apparent wraparound" via SimpleLruTruncate() rounding
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-07 03:07:16 Re: archive status ".ready" files may be created too early