On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 05:09:05PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > That could be helpful. Wouldn't it be better to use "end-of-recovery > checkpoint" instead? That's the common wording in the code comments. > > I don't see the point of patch 0002. In the same paragraph, we > already know that this applies to any checkpoints.
Thinking more about this.. Could it be better to just add some calls to set_ps_display() directly in CreateCheckPoint()? This way, both the checkpointer as well as the startup process at the end of recovery would benefit from the change. -- Michael