From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs? |
Date: | 2020-08-31 09:03:02 |
Message-ID: | 20200831.180302.1762036380359974457.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Tue, 18 Aug 2020 16:43:47 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> Thank you very much. I'll do that after some polishing.
>
> A near-by discussion about OpenSSL3.0 conflicts with this but it's
> easy to follow.
Rebased. Fixed bogus tests and strange tentative API change of
SSLServer.pm. Corrected a (maybe) spelling mistake. I'm going to
register this to the coming CF.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Allow-directory-name-for-GUC-ssl_crl_file-and-connec.patch | text/x-patch | 68.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Georgios | 2020-08-31 09:04:10 | Re: [PATCH] - Provide robust alternatives for replace_string |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-08-31 08:56:58 | Re: "cert" + clientcert=verify-ca in pg_hba.conf? |