Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Sait Talha Nisanci <Sait(dot)Nisanci(at)microsoft(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Date: 2020-08-27 13:55:33
Message-ID: 20200827135533.GJ29590@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greetings,

* Sait Talha Nisanci (Sait(dot)Nisanci(at)microsoft(dot)com) wrote:
> I have run some benchmarks for this patch. Overall it seems that there is a good improvement with the patch on recovery times:

Maybe I missed it somewhere, but what's the OS/filesystem being used
here..? What's the filesystem block size..?

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-08-27 13:56:47 Re: Support for OUT parameters in procedures
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-08-27 13:51:56 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)