Re: some unused parameters cleanup

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: some unused parameters cleanup
Date: 2020-08-26 08:11:10
Message-ID: 20200826081110.GA28952@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 06:38:52AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I had meant to exclude cases like this from this patch set. If you see a
> case like this in *this* patch set, please point it out.

Last time I looked at that a lot of parameters are kept around as a
matter of symmetry with siblings, like tablecmds.c. FWIW:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190130073317.GP3121@paquier.xyz

Saying that, I can see that you have been careful here and I don't see
anything like that in most of the changes you are proposing here. You
could say that for findNamespace() or _moveBefore() perhaps, but there
are also some routines not making use of an Archive. So this cleanup
looks fine to me.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Fan 2020-08-26 08:21:35 Re: Improve planner cost estimations for alternative subplans
Previous Message Andy Fan 2020-08-26 08:03:36 Re: Hybrid Hash/Nested Loop joins and caching results from subplans