From: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Roger Pack <rogerdpack2(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: deb repo doesn't have latest. or possible to update web page? |
Date: | 2020-08-24 11:33:25 |
Message-ID: | 20200824113325.GC853670@msg.df7cb.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Re: Magnus Hagander
> > The confusion in my case is I wasn't sure why my distro was named,
> > tried the instructions and it...half worked.
> >
> > Maybe something like this?
> >
> > The PostgreSQL apt repository supports the currently supported stable
> > versions of Debian with the latest versions of Postgres:
> >
> > xxx
> > xxx
> >
> > Older versions of Debian may also be supported with older versions of
> > Postgres.
> >
>
> Well, they are not supported. The packages may be there, but they are not
> supported. I think that's an important distinction. Maybe add something
> like "some packages may be available for older versions of Debian, but are
> not supported" or such?
We have had "Packages for older PostgreSQL versions and older
Debian/Ubuntu distributions will continue to stay in the repository,
but will in most cases not be updated anymore." right in the first
paragraph on the front-page since about the first revision.
> Or get rid of the wheezy side altogether?
> >
>
> Or move it to the archive. I'm not entirely sure why it's still there.
> Christoph?
Last time I checked there were still some docker containers using
wheezy to pull older PG server versions. Though I guess it's time to
put it to rest now that jessie is also EOL.
Christoph
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com | 2020-08-24 11:33:31 | RE: extension patch of CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER |
Previous Message | Geoff Winkless | 2020-08-24 10:37:40 | Re: INSERT ON CONFLICT and RETURNING |