Re: pgsql: snapshot scalability: cache snapshots using a xact completion co

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: snapshot scalability: cache snapshots using a xact completion co
Date: 2020-08-19 22:37:04
Message-ID: 20200819223704.GA17603@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Aug-18, Andres Freund wrote:

> So unless somebody disagrees I'm gonna add a new
> prepared-transactions-2.spec.

I think keeping things separate if they're not really related is
sensible.

I think it might be a good idea to add that test to older branches too,
even if it's just 13 -- at least temporarily.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-08-20 01:35:57 pgsql: Acquire ProcArrayLock exclusively in ProcArrayClearTransaction.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-08-19 18:08:11 pgsql: Suppress unnecessary RelabelType nodes in yet more cases.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-08-19 22:53:43 Re: Creating a function for exposing memory usage of backend process
Previous Message David Rowley 2020-08-19 22:04:10 Re: Hybrid Hash/Nested Loop joins and caching results from subplans