From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData() |
Date: | 2020-08-16 20:52:58 |
Message-ID: | 20200816205258.pjvmoljrk7ntqb3n@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2020-08-16 13:31:53 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I now luckily have a rr trace of the problem, so I hope I can narrow it
> down to the original problem fairly quickly.
Gna, I think I see the problem. In at least one place I wrongly
accessed the 'dense' array of in-progress xids using the 'pgprocno',
instead of directly using the [0...procArray->numProcs) index.
Working on a fix, together with some improved asserts.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2020-08-16 21:11:46 | Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData() |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2020-08-16 20:31:53 | Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData() |