Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Pavel Biryukov <79166341370(at)yandex(dot)ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table)
Date: 2020-08-11 17:22:41
Message-ID: 20200811172241.izeyvksgevbtvhcd@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2020-08-11 19:02:57 +0300, Pavel Biryukov wrote:
> I just want to point that Npgsql provider for .Net Core builds queries like
> that (RETURNING xmin) to keep track for concurrency.

Could you provide a bit more details about what that's actually used
for?

Regards,

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-08-11 17:52:00 Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-08-11 17:13:18 Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-08-11 17:41:59 Re: massive FPI_FOR_HINT load after promote
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-08-11 17:13:18 Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table)