Re: 'with' regression tests fails rarely (and spuriously)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 'with' regression tests fails rarely (and spuriously)
Date: 2020-07-23 18:00:59
Message-ID: 20200723180059.zmg5jo6tm46i7e4e@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2020-07-23 13:05:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > I've twice seen the below failure when running tests in a loop (to
> > verify another rare issue in a patch is fixed):
>
> Weird. It sort of looks like autovacuum came along and changed the
> stats for those tables, but I didn't think they were big enough to
> draw autovac's attention.

Hm. I guess I could run them again after enabling more logging. Don't
really have a better idea. Probably not worth investing more energy into
if I can't readily reproduce over night.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-07-23 18:10:18 HOT vs freezing issue causing "cannot freeze committed xmax"
Previous Message Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker 2020-07-23 17:50:32 Re: Making CASE error handling less surprising