Re: expose parallel leader in CSV and log_line_prefix

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: expose parallel leader in CSV and log_line_prefix
Date: 2020-07-17 02:41:07
Message-ID: 20200717024107.GC29811@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 01:16:40PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Jul-10, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>> That's what's done.
>>
>> + <entry>Process ID of the parallel group leader if this process was
>> + at some point involved in parallel query, otherwise null. For a
>> + parallel group leader itself, this field is set to its own process
>> + ID.</entry>
>
> Oh, okay by me then.

Please note that this choice comes from BecomeLockGroupLeader(), where
a leader registers itself in lockGroupLeader, and remains set as such
as long as the process is alive so we would always get a value for a
process once it got involved in parallel query. This patch is just
doing what we do in pg_stat_get_activity(), with the padding handling.
It is true that this may cause log_line_prefix to be overly verbose in
the case where you keep a lot of sessions alive for long time when
they got all involved at least once in parallel query as most of them
would just refer to their own PID, but I think that it is better to be
consistent with what we do already with pg_stat_activity, as that's
the data present in the PGPROC entries.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2020-07-17 02:42:18 Re: [PATCH] Add support for choosing huge page size
Previous Message Masahiro Ikeda 2020-07-17 02:06:29 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2