| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Multi-byte character case-folding |
| Date: | 2020-07-14 20:08:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20200714200811.GA17494@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 08:32:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yes, a GUC changing this would be a headache. It would be just as much of
> a compatibility and security hazard as standard_conforming_strings (which
> indeed I've been thinking of proposing that we get rid of; it's hung
> around long enough).
+1
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anastasia Lubennikova | 2020-07-14 20:22:55 | Re: Rethinking opclass member checks and dependency strength |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2020-07-14 19:59:21 | Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..." |