Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate use of name "relkind"

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate use of name "relkind"
Date: 2020-07-11 04:44:01
Message-ID: 20200711044145.GC1863@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 10:00:47PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> There are two patches on this thread v2-0001 being much smaller than
> v2-0002. I have looked at 0001 for now, and, like Alvaro, this
> renaming makes sense to me. Those commands work on objects that are
> relkinds, except for one OBJECT_TYPE. So, let's get 0001 patch
> merged. Any objections from others?

I have been through this one again and applied it as cc35d89.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2020-07-11 04:44:24 Re: proposal: schema variables
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2020-07-11 03:25:54 Re: Stale external URL in doc?