Re: Cache lookup errors with functions manipulation object addresses

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cache lookup errors with functions manipulation object addresses
Date: 2020-07-07 15:08:30
Message-ID: 20200707150830.GA8895@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Jul-07, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 10:56:53AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I think "routine" was more correct. We introduced that terminology to
> > encompass both functions and procedures, back when real procedures were
> > added. See the definitions in the glossary for example.
>
> Okay, fine by me, while we have getProcedureTypeDescription() working
> on pg_proc entries ;)

That's a holdover from old times, when we thought functions were
procedures. That's no longer the case.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-07-07 15:09:49 Re: Proposal: Automatic partition creation
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-07-07 15:06:39 Re: pg_resetwal --next-transaction-id may cause database failed to restart.