Re: Auxiliary Processes and MyAuxProc

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Mike Palmiotto <mike(dot)palmiotto(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Yuli Khodorkovskiy <yuli(dot)khodorkovskiy(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Auxiliary Processes and MyAuxProc
Date: 2020-07-02 15:03:39
Message-ID: 20200702150339.GA4519@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Jul-02, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

> > On 27 Mar 2020, at 00:30, Mike Palmiotto <mike(dot)palmiotto(at)crunchydata(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Are these pieces required to make this patchset committable? Is there
> > anything else needed at this point to make it committable?
>
> The submitted version no longer applies, the 0009 patch has conflicts in
> postmaster.c. Can you please submit a new version of the patch?

If the first 8 patches still apply, please do keep it as needs-review
though, since we can still give advice on those first parts.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-07-02 15:08:49 Re: Auxiliary Processes and MyAuxProc
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-07-02 14:48:37 Re: Using Valgrind to detect faulty buffer accesses (no pin or buffer content lock held)