Re: INDEX with optional storage parameter value

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: galiev_mr(at)taximaxim(dot)ru, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: INDEX with optional storage parameter value
Date: 2020-06-30 16:28:23
Message-ID: 20200630162823.GD28710@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 09:53:17AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 04:18:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 05:14:23PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I found a few more places that also didn't properly document this;
> > > patch attached.
> >
> > Good catch! I am not seeing any missing spots, so this looks good to
> > me. You are planning a backpatch, right?
>
> Yes, backpatch. I found the pattern of areas needing fixes to be quite
> odd. ;-)

Patch applied through 9.5.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Borisov 2020-07-02 14:51:54 Re: [PATCH] Clarification of use logical operators inside phrase operator
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-06-30 16:28:07 Re: INDEX with optional storage parameter value