| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Felix Lechner <felix(dot)lechner(at)lease-up(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support |
| Date: | 2020-06-29 14:31:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20200629143159.GA3125@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings,
* Christoph Berg (myon(at)debian(dot)org) wrote:
> Re: Peter Eisentraut
> > What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
>
> Avoiding the OpenSSL-vs-GPL linkage problem with readline.
I'd further say "folks are interested in an alternative to OpenSSL" as
being a generally good reason to add support for alternatives, such as
the patch to add NSS support, which would also help with the GPL linkage
problem and add a higher FIPS rating option than OpenSSL.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2020-06-29 15:02:43 | Parallell hashjoin sometimes ignores temp_tablespaces |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2020-06-29 14:30:36 | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support |