Re: should libpq also require TLSv1.2 by default?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: should libpq also require TLSv1.2 by default?
Date: 2020-06-25 22:55:59
Message-ID: 20200625225559.GH12486@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 06:44:05PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, the server-side report of the problem looks like
>
> LOG: could not accept SSL connection: wrong version number

I like that one. ;-)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-06-25 22:58:53 Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-06-25 22:53:50 Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view