Re: Missing HashAgg EXPLAIN ANALYZE details for parallel plans

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Missing HashAgg EXPLAIN ANALYZE details for parallel plans
Date: 2020-06-19 19:14:45
Message-ID: 20200619191445.GA20665@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Jun-19, David Rowley wrote:

> > + size = offsetof(SharedAggInfo, sinstrument)
> > + + pcxt->nworkers * sizeof(AggregateInstrumentation);
> >
> > => There's a couple places where I'd prefer to see "+" at the end of the
> > preceding line (but YMMV).
>
> I pretty much just copied the whole of that code from nodeSort.c. I'm
> more inclined to just keep it as similar to that as possible. However,
> if pgindent decides otherwise, then I'll go with that. I imagine it
> won't move it though as that code has already been through indentation
> a few times before.

pgindent won't change your choice here. This seems an ideological
issue; each committer has got their style. Some people prefer to put
operators at the end of the line, others do it this way.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-06-19 19:17:53 Re: Fast DSM segments
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2020-06-19 18:57:16 Re: [PATCH] Allow to specify restart_lsn in pg_create_physical_replication_slot()