| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexey Kondratov <a(dot)kondratov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, dim(at)tapoueh(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Physical replication slot advance is not persistent |
| Date: | 2020-06-18 07:47:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20200618074746.GG118592@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 04:27:27PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> We could do that. Now I found cleaner the direct comparison of
> pg_replication_slots.restart before and after the restart. So I have
> kept it.
And done. There were conflicts in 001_stream_rep.pl for 11 and 12 but
I have reworked the patch on those branches to have a minimum amount
of diffs with the other branches. This part additionally needed to
stop standby_1 before running the last part of the test to be able to
drop its physical slot on the primary.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-06-18 09:55:10 | Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY |
| Previous Message | Juan José Santamaría Flecha | 2020-06-18 07:43:54 | Re: factorial of negative numbers |