Re: Review for GetWALAvailability()

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Review for GetWALAvailability()
Date: 2020-06-17 18:04:37
Message-ID: 20200617180437.GA1812@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I think passing the slot name when the slot is also passed is useless
and wasteful; it'd be better to pass NULL for the name and ignore the
strcmp() in that case -- in fact I suggest to forbid passing both name
and slot. (Any failure there would risk raising an error during
checkpoint, which is undesirable.)

So I propose the following tweaks to your patch, and otherwise +1.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
tweak.patch text/x-diff 1.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-06-17 18:05:46 Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-06-17 17:59:26 Re: language cleanups in code and docs