Re: factorial of negative numbers

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: factorial of negative numbers
Date: 2020-06-16 08:55:18
Message-ID: 20200616085518.GA31175@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 08:31:21AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 06:00, Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Divison by zero is really undefined, 12345678 * 12345678 (just some numbers) is out of range of say int4, but factorial of a negative number has some meaning and is defined but PostgreSQL does not support it.
> >
>
> Actually, I think undefined/out-of-range is the right error to throw here.
>
> Most common implementations do regard factorial as undefined for
> anything other than positive integers, as well as following the
> convention that factorial(0) = 1. Some implementations extend the
> factorial to non-integer inputs, negative inputs, or even complex
> inputs by defining it in terms of the gamma function. However, even
> then, it is undefined for negative integer inputs.

Wow, they define it for negative inputs, but not negative integer
inputs? I am curious what the logic is behind that.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-06-16 09:06:55 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-06-16 08:30:15 Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.