Re: Internal key management system

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, Ahsan Hadi <ahsan(dot)hadi(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Moon, Insung" <tsukiwamoon(dot)pgsql(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope(at)jackdb(dot)com>, cary huang <hcary328(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Internal key management system
Date: 2020-06-12 17:33:38
Message-ID: 20200612173338.GA12956@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 09:17:37AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> The question is what should be put in the protocol, and I would tend to
> think that some careful design time should be put in it.

I still don't see the value of this vs. its complexity.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-06-12 17:44:05 Re: Infinities in type numeric
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-06-12 17:28:37 Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup