Re: valgrind versus pg_atomic_init()

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: valgrind versus pg_atomic_init()
Date: 2020-06-09 03:25:09
Message-ID: 20200609032509.a76hlgvmxhs35gqy@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2020-06-08 18:21:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Yea, it could just do that. It seemed slightly easier/clearer, back when
> > I wrote it, to just use pg_atomic_write* for the initialization, but
> > this seems enough of a reason to stop doing so. Will change it in all
> > branches, unless somebody sees a reason to not do so?
>
> Works for me.

And done.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2020-06-09 03:28:20 Re: Intermittent test plan change in "privileges" test on BF animal prion
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-06-09 02:54:40 Re: Intermittent test plan change in "privileges" test on BF animal prion