| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: minor doc fix - garbage in example of result of unnest |
| Date: | 2020-06-05 15:38:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20200605153811.4m3pnun526ndf6dp@development |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 09:56:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
>> index 7c06afd3ea..3b810c0eb4 100644
>> --- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
>> +++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
>> @@ -17821,7 +17821,6 @@ SELECT NULLIF(value, '(none)') ...
>> 1
>> 2
>> </programlisting>
>> - (2 rows in result)
>> </para></entry>
>> </row>
>
>That's not "garbage", I put it there intentionally.
>
Why is it outside the <programlisting> though? Also, the next unnest
example does not include the number of rows - why the difference?
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-06-05 15:49:46 | Re: minor doc fix - garbage in example of result of unnest |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-06-05 15:20:52 | Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) |