Re: segmentation fault using currtid and partitioned tables

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: segmentation fault using currtid and partitioned tables
Date: 2020-06-01 05:55:27
Message-ID: 20200601054610.GC4121@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:26:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ugh. Aside from the stale-pointer-deref problem, once we drop the lock
> we can't even be sure the table still exists. +1 for back-patch.

Thanks. Fixed down to 9.5 then to make prion happier.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Khandekar 2020-06-01 06:02:48 Re: Inlining of couple of functions in pl_exec.c improves performance
Previous Message Amit Khandekar 2020-06-01 05:53:04 Re: Inlining of couple of functions in pl_exec.c improves performance