| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrey Klychkov <aaklychkov(at)mail(dot)ru>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re[2]: |
| Date: | 2020-05-29 05:29:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20200529052939.GD44192@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:14:20AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> +1, but I'd change the whole sentence. Maybe
>
> Use the CONCURRENTLY option. See REINDEX, where all the caveats of
> this option are explained in detail.
Agreed. Here is a patch for 12~. Please let me know if that's fine
for you.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| reindexdb-docs.patch | text/x-diff | 677 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-05-29 13:17:58 | Re: Re[2]: |
| Previous Message | Jawarilal, Manish | 2020-05-29 04:23:24 | RE: pgbench bug / limitation |