| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jesse Zhang <sbjesse(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fix compilation failure against LLVM 11 |
| Date: | 2020-05-28 08:07:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20200528080746.GC44192@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 07:49:45AM -0700, Jesse Zhang wrote:
> For bystanders: Andres and I argued for "fixing this sooner and
> backpatch" and Michael suggested "wait longer and whack all moles". We
> have waited, and there seems to be only one mole (finding all dead
> unbroken "include"s was left as an exercise for the reader). Have we
> come to an agreement on this?
If Andres could take care of this issue as he feels is suited, that's
OK for me. I could look at that and play with llvm builds. Now I am
not really familiar with it, so it would take me some time but we are
all here to learn :)
Please note that I would still wait for their next GA release to plug
in any extra holes at the same time. @Jesse: or is this change
actually part of the upcoming 10.0.1?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-05-28 08:09:25 | Re: max_slot_wal_keep_size comment in postgresql.conf |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-05-28 08:04:36 | Re: SIGSEGV from START_REPLICATION 0/XXXXXXX in XLogSendPhysical () at walsender.c:2762 |