Re: password_encryption default

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: password_encryption default
Date: 2020-05-27 13:59:17
Message-ID: 20200527135917.GV3418@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greetings,

* Jonathan S. Katz (jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org) wrote:
> On 5/27/20 9:13 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> Seems like the better choice yeah. Since we're changing the default anyway,
> >> maybe now is the time to do that? Or if not, maybe have it log an explicit
> >> deprecation warning when it loads a config with it?
> >
> > Not sure that's worth it here, so I would just remove the whole. It
> > would be confusing to keep the past values and have them map to
> > something we think is not an appropriate default.
>
> +1 to removing the legacy options. It could break some people on legacy
> upgrades, but my guess would be that said situations are very small, and
> we would document the removal of these as "breaking changes" in the
> release notes.

Agreed- let's remove the legacy options. As I've mentioned elsewhere,
distros may manage the issue for us, and if we want to get into it, we
could consider adding support to pg_upgrade to complain if it comes
across a legacy setting that isn't valid. I'm not sure that's
worthwhile though.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2020-05-27 14:00:35 Re: New 'pg' consolidated metacommand patch
Previous Message Andy Fan 2020-05-27 13:58:04 Re: Make the qual cost on index Filter slightly higher than qual cost on index Cond.