Re: New Feature Request

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bert Scalzo <bertscalzo2(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New Feature Request
Date: 2020-05-26 01:21:26
Message-ID: 20200526012126.GB14122@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 07:53:40PM -0500, Bert Scalzo wrote:
> I am reposting this from a few months back (see below). I am not trying to be a
> pest, just very motivated. I really think this feature has merit, and if not
> generally worthwhile, I'd be willing to pay someone to code it for me as I
> don't have strong enough C skills to modify the PostgreSQL code myself. So
> anyone who might have such skills that would be interested, please contact me:
> bertscalzo2(at)gmail(dot)com(dot)

I think your best bet is to try getting someone to write a hook
that will do the replacement so that you don't need to modify too much
of the Postgres core code. You will need to have the hook updated for
new versions of Postgres, which adds to the complexity.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-05-26 01:36:50 Re: Default gucs for EXPLAIN
Previous Message Masahiro Ikeda 2020-05-26 01:16:19 Why don't you to document pg_shmem_allocations view's name list?