Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Arthur Nascimento <tureba(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields
Date: 2020-05-26 00:19:43
Message-ID: 20200526001943.GA14122@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 01:45:57PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:14:06PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 2020-04-21 21:08, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > <para>
> > > - A record can have one of the seven formats
> > > + A record can have one of the 11 formats
> >
> > I think this sort of thing is a sign that the number should be replaced by
> > "several".
>
> Agreed:
>
> - A record can have one of the 11 formats
> + A record can have several formats:

Patch applied through PG 12.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-05-26 00:38:49 Re: BUG #16460: Error when executing REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW WITH DATA;
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-05-25 20:35:41 Re: logical replication: could not create file "state.tmp": File exists