Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs
Date: 2020-05-20 07:13:51
Message-ID: 20200520071351.GG2355@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 01:02:12PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> That thread didn't resolve why check_canonical_path() is necessary there.
> Maybe the existing uses could be removed?

This would impact log_directory, external_pid_file,
stats_temp_directory, where it is still useful to show to the user
cleaned up names, no? See for example 2594cf0.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2020-05-20 07:23:37 Re: Problem with pg_atomic_compare_exchange_u64 at 32-bit platforms
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-05-20 07:03:26 Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs