| From: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization |
| Date: | 2020-05-16 12:24:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20200516122431.b7wtpm7dspsaxfro@localhost |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:52:20AM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
> I wonder if anyone has plans to try again with this optimization in v14
> cycle? The patches no longer apply thanks to the incremental sort patch,
> but I suppose fixing that should not be extremely hard.
>
> The 2020-07 CF is still a couple weeks away, but it'd be good to know if
> there are any plans to revive this. I'm willing to spend some time on
> reviewing / testing this, etc.
Yes, if you believe that this patch has potential, I would love to pick
it up again.
> I've only quickly skimmed the old thread, but IIRC there were two main
> challenges in getting the optimization right:
>
>
> 1) deciding which orderings are interesting / worth additional work
>
> I think we need to consider these orderings, in addition to the one
> specified in GROUP BY:
>
> 1) as specified in ORDER BY (if different from 1)
What is the idea behind considering this ordering?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2020-05-16 12:28:02 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |
| Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2020-05-16 11:39:18 | Re: calling procedures is slow and consumes extra much memory against calling function |