Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Date: 2020-05-12 02:16:53
Message-ID: 20200512021653.GA971@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-May-11, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 08:34:56PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > Yes, we had to touch the source code in order to add documentation; but
> > so what? Everything touches the source code, but that doesn't mean it
> > should be listed there. I don't see what's the problem with having a
> > new subsection in the relnotes entitled "Documentation" where these two
> > items appears (glossary + new doc table format) are listed. It's not
> > like it's going to cost us a lot of space or anything.

> Well, are you suggesting a new section because the glossary shouldn't be
> listed under source code, or because you want the function reformatting
> added? We just need to understand what the purpose is. We already have
> the glossary listed, since that is new and user-visible.

IMO the table reformatting change is significant enough to be
noteworthy. I'm suggesting that a new Documentation subsection would
list both that and the glossary, separately from Source Code -- so it'd
be E.1.3.10 and Source Code would be E.1.3.11.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-05-12 02:23:53 Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-05-12 02:07:23 Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft