Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Arthur Nascimento <tureba(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields
Date: 2020-04-22 01:17:22
Message-ID: 20200422011722.GL19613@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:43:19PM -0300, Arthur Nascimento wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 16:08, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > > Ah, I see. Updated patch attached.
> >
> > That looks perfect. Thank you!
>
> Oh, there might be another line to change in the 'address' column.
> I see you changed the one under 'IP-address/IP-mask' that starts with
> "These fields...".
> But there is a similar one under 'address', that starts with "This field...".

Agreed, fixed.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

Attachment Content-Type Size
hba.diff text/x-diff 7.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-04-22 01:19:35 Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery
Previous Message Devrim Gündüz 2020-04-22 00:14:23 Re: BUG #16354: No geos 3.8.1 package for RHEL 8