From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: forgotten initalization of a variable |
Date: | 2020-04-22 00:13:47 |
Message-ID: | 20200422.091347.973292708730604431.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Wed, 22 Apr 2020 08:13:02 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote in
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 06:09:30PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > At Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:34:26 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote in
> >> a checkpoint record now, but this routine could be called elsewhere in
> >> the future. Please see the attached.
> >
> > It looks fine to me.
>
> Fixed this way, then. Thanks for the report!
Thans for fixing this!
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-04-22 01:06:48 | Re: DETACH PARTITION and FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-04-22 00:13:06 | Re: Remove non-fast promotion Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2 |