Re: forgotten initalization of a variable

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: forgotten initalization of a variable
Date: 2020-04-22 00:13:47
Message-ID: 20200422.091347.973292708730604431.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Wed, 22 Apr 2020 08:13:02 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote in
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 06:09:30PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > At Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:34:26 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote in
> >> a checkpoint record now, but this routine could be called elsewhere in
> >> the future. Please see the attached.
> >
> > It looks fine to me.
>
> Fixed this way, then. Thanks for the report!

Thans for fixing this!

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2020-04-22 01:06:48 Re: DETACH PARTITION and FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-04-22 00:13:06 Re: Remove non-fast promotion Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2