Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority
Date: 2020-04-17 08:07:06
Message-ID: 20200417.170706.1152908438290368702.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Fri, 17 Apr 2020 16:03:34 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote in
> I agree that it might be worth considering the removal of am_sync for
> the master branch or v14. But I think that it should not be
> back-patched.

Ah! Agreed.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-04-17 08:32:50 Re: PG compilation error with Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-04-17 08:06:29 Re: 001_rep_changes.pl stalls