Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steven Pousty <steve(dot)pousty(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date: 2020-04-16 23:03:04
Message-ID: 20200416230304.GA28390@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

v1 is good.

I like your v2 even better. If it becomes possible to remove or soften
the "inter-row" horizontal line with CSS tricks afterwards, that would
be swell, but even without that, I cast my vote to using this table
format.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2020-04-16 23:13:00 Re: sqlsmith crash incremental sort
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2020-04-16 22:59:41 [PATCH] Tiny optimization on nbtinsert.c