Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com, isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com, pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date: 2020-04-16 05:18:51
Message-ID: 20200416.141851.1777893443611607977.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:04:34 -0400, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:54 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > st 15. 4. 2020 v 17:43 odesílatel Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> napsal:
> >> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 11:26, Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
> >>> The best way to achieve this is to use some styling (font style and color).
> >>>
> >>> Attached you will find two different options I worked on very quickly.
> >>
> >> I really like the first. Just a couple of suggestions I would make:
> >
> > yes, it is very well readable
>
> +1.

+1.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-04-16 05:23:05 Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2020-04-16 05:18:28 Re: Include sequence relation support in logical replication