From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | magnus(at)hagander(dot)net |
Cc: | robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? |
Date: | 2020-04-13 06:45:56 |
Message-ID: | 20200413.154556.396241548734058952.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I recklessly join the discussion about naming.
At Sun, 12 Apr 2020 17:29:55 +0200, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote in
> Agreed, pgsql would certainly be better than pg_ctl.
I like pgsql. And if we are going to join to the THREE-LETTERS
CONTROLLER COMMANDS ALLIANCE, pgc (pg controller) might be a candidate
of the controller program.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-04-13 07:14:14 | Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-04-13 06:34:24 | Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority |