Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: magnus(at)hagander(dot)net
Cc: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Subject: Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?
Date: 2020-04-13 06:45:56
Message-ID: 20200413.154556.396241548734058952.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I recklessly join the discussion about naming.

At Sun, 12 Apr 2020 17:29:55 +0200, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote in
> Agreed, pgsql would certainly be better than pg_ctl.

I like pgsql. And if we are going to join to the THREE-LETTERS
CONTROLLER COMMANDS ALLIANCE, pgc (pg controller) might be a candidate
of the controller program.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-04-13 07:14:14 Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-04-13 06:34:24 Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority