Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Shaun Thomas <shaun(dot)thomas(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort
Date: 2020-04-08 15:58:27
Message-ID: 20200408155827.qj2e6o6zxl6wjxaj@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 11:42:12AM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:29 AM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/8/20 11:13 AM, James Coleman wrote:
>> >>
>> >> James, can you verify it that's still true?
>>
>> I marked this entry as committed in the 2020-03 CF but it's not clear to
>> me if that's entirely true. I'll leave it up to you (all) to move it to
>> the 2020-07 CF if there is remaining work (other than making the build
>> farm happy).
>
>Thanks.
>
>I think it's true enough. The vast majority is committed, and the
>small amount that isn't we'll leave as future improvements and
>separate threads.
>

Right. The remaining bit is a generic issue not entirely specific to
incremental sort, so we better not hide it in this CF entry.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-04-08 16:02:39 Re: DETACH PARTITION and FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-04-08 15:57:08 Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error