|From:||Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|To:||Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>|
|Cc:||legrand legrand <legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org|
|Subject:||Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 05:37:27PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2020/04/03 16:26, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 01:04:28PM -0700, legrand legrand wrote:
> > > Fujii Masao-4 wrote
> > > > On 2020/04/01 18:19, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Finally I pushed the patch!
> > > > Many thanks for all involved in this patch!
> > > >
> > > > As a remaining TODO item, I'm thinking that the document would need to
> > > > be improved. For example, previously the query was not stored in pgss
> > > > when it failed. But, in v13, if pgss_planning is enabled, such a query is
> > > > stored because the planning succeeds. Without the explanation about
> > > > that behavior in the document, I'm afraid that users will get confused.
> > > > Thought?
> > >
> > > Thank you all for this work and especially to Julian for its major
> > > contribution !
> > Thanks a lot to everyone! This was quite a long journey.
> > > Regarding the TODO point: Yes I agree that it can be improved.
> > > My proposal:
> > >
> > > "Note that planning and execution statistics are updated only at their
> > > respective end phase, and only for successfull operations.
> > > For exemple executions counters of a long running SELECT query,
> > > will be updated at the execution end, without showing any progress
> > > report in the interval.
> > > Other exemple, if the statement is successfully planned but fails in
> > > the execution phase, only its planning statistics are stored.
> > > This may give uncorrelated plans vs calls informations."
> Thanks for the proposal!
> > There are numerous reasons for lack of correlation between number of planning
> > and number of execution, so I'm afraid that this will give users the false
> > impression that only failed execution can lead to that.
> > Here's some enhancement on your proposal:
> > "Note that planning and execution statistics are updated only at their
> > respective end phase, and only for successful operations.
> > For example the execution counters of a long running query
> > will only be updated at the execution end, without showing any progress
> > report before that.
> Probably since this is not the example for explaining the relationship of
> planning and execution stats, it's better to explain this separately or just
> drop it?
> What about the attached patch based on your proposals?
Thanks Fuji-san, it looks perfect to me!
|Next Messagefirstname.lastname@example.org||2020-04-08 09:35:05||Re: recovery_target_action=pause with confusing hint|
|Previous Message||Alexander Korotkov||2020-04-08 09:28:32||Re: [PATCH] RUM Postgres 13 patch|