Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join
Date: 2020-04-07 15:15:21
Message-ID: 20200407151521.e2oyfcythfplluz5@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 05:28:52PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:15 AM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Attached is the original patch (0001) and one patch (0002) with
>> changes including those by Tomas and Ashutosh.
>
>I merged the patches into one and rebased it against HEAD. Attached
>is a new version, in which I added the commit message as well. Does
>that make sense? If there are no objections, I’ll commit the patch.
>

+1

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais 2020-04-07 15:17:36 Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-04-07 15:02:43 Re: A bug when use get_bit() function for a long bytea string